par azantinge » 22 Janvier 2013, 14:40
The Maturity Factor
Author, Malcolm Gladwell, spends a significant part of his book, Outliers, on the point that young athletes with birthdays early in the year have an important advantage in team sports with age groups defined by the calendar year. Using the same logic, it would suggest that a team in the Copa Sao Paulo de Futebol Junior (Copinha) would have a greater chance of success if it were to choose an older group of players. The Copinha, in 2013, allows players from birth years from 1993 to 1997. While there is likely to be the occasional exception, older players are likely to be more experienced, more mature, and physically larger. Even the younger exceptions would benefit from being surrounded by older teammates. It seems that might be the case in the Copinha after looking at this year's semi-finalists and some from clubs known to have selected a younger team.
It is clear that success sometimes is sacrificed for development in youth tournaments and the Copinha is no exception. While most supporters of a specific club will look only a wins and losses, some clubs are thinking more long term when it comes to a specific youth tournament. In considering this issue, I looked at the four remaining teams and compared their use of players with seven others that had were known to have other motivations in this tournament or had unexpected success or failure.
In fact, it is surprising just how different these teams are. Using information provided by the Sao Paulo federation that records the number of times a player dresses, the youngest two teams, Desportivo Brasil and Comercial each included 9 different players born in the birth years, 1995 & younger, with none of the semi-finalist using more than one. It remains to be seen if the teams for Desportivo Brasil and Comercial are kept together and re-entered next year; but, it is clear that both have the young talent to make noise in this tournament next year if they choose to do so.
In the end, it seems maturity is an important factor in success in this tournament. Palmeiras, the decided favourite in this tournament, has assembled an older but also includes five players with substantial senior team experience. Of the 23 different players it has dressed in this tournament, 13 were born in 1993 and only one was born in 1995 or younger with remaining 9 from 1994. The remaining three semi-finalists, Bahia, Goias, and Santos, also tended to have players from the birth years 1993 & 1994 with only Goias having one of their players younger than that.
Gremio Barueri also drew attention because they were abnormally weak this year compared to most years where they would normally advance to the second phase at least. This year they were unable to gain even a point. Gremio Barueri used only five older players with birth year, 1993, and used four players with birth year, 1995 or younger. While not as young as Comercial or Desportivo Brasil, Gremio Barueri was slightly younger than average and would have possibly done better if it had used a more mature team.
Also, in looking at two other surprise teams from Atibaia and Velo Clube, it would seem that they too leaned toward being a little older. Velo Clube, however, did dress 5 younger players but then offset that by dressing eleven over their games from birth year, 1993.
On the other hand, the teams of big clubs that fell at the first phase also suggest that maturity could have played a role. The winner of the Copa do Brasil at the Under 20, Vitoria, had a younger than average team with seven players born in 1995 or later; but offset that somewhat by having seven players born in 1993 as well. Flamengo doesn't fit as well as it was an older team than many but younger than the four semi-finalists. Flamengo had dressed four players born 1995 or later but also had 10 players born in 1993 that it used.
In the end, it may not be the sole reason for success or failure but it likely did influence the odds. There are clearly other factors that come into play as well. In addition to the talent on display, the maturity of a team may have simply reduced the uncertainties related to teenage emotions and in a tournament where a loss means exit, stability can be valuable.
Who will go through to the final? Maturity probably won't be much of a factor anymore since there is very little between the teams now.
Dernière édition par
azantinge le 22 Janvier 2013, 14:47, édité 1 fois au total.